During the interview Dickerson said something interesting: The people around Pierce — and likely Pierce himself — don’t expect to be back.
“… I know that the company that Paul Pierce hangs around in, they do not believe – and I don’t think Paul Pierce believes – that he is going to be brought back next year at $15 million. I know for a fact that people around Paul Pierce have pretty much resigned themselves to the fact that he’s played his final game in a Boston Celtics uniform. Again, Paul wants to stay – obviously for $15 million — but he wants to finish his career in a Celtics uniform…. Probably a buyout (rather than a trade)…
“(Garnett) doesn’t want to be around for a rebuilding phase for another year. If Paul’s gone, I think without a doubt Kevin Garnett is gone, either by retirement or he finally decides to waive his no-trade clause, and the Celtics maybe work something out with a Clippers team. But the list is real short. The teams that Kevin Garnett would go to, there might be two of them on it, and they both might be the Clippers and Lakers.”
Dickerson shoots down the idea that Doc Rivers will leave to coach another team next year.
For the record, Dickerson says he thinks the Celtics should bring everyone back for one more run, even if they are not going to win a title. As Dickerson notes, tearing it down does mean you start the rebuilding process earlier but with Rajon Rondo, Jeff Green and others still in the fold they are not going to be one of the three or four worst teams in the NBA. Without blowing the entire thing up (including trading Rondo and Green) they are not going to have a real shot at Andrew Wiggins, Julius Randle or the other elite guys expected in the 2014 NBA Draft. Boston would struggle to become bad enough fast enough.
And if you can’t be that bad, why not bring KG and Pierce back and be an interesting five seed?
But it doesn’t feel like that is the direction things are heading in Boston?